Margaret
JUNE 21, 2013 04:40 PM

Larry,

Glad you like the blog! The photo of our original building does make the building look narrower than the illustration does. We don't have any records of how the building was modified during out tenure there, but clearly the artist made a few aesthetic enhancements in the depiction of the building and the setting. The footprint of the building is drawn as being narrow on the Sanborn map that's shown in the post. Also, the angle of the photograph probably makes the building look narrower than it actually was. Regarding the museum, please send me an email.

Margaret

Full name will be displayed as entered.
About text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.
By submitting your comments, you agree that your comments may be made available to the public. All comments will be reviewed before posting, and if approved, will be shared publicly on the site. Please do not include any information and/or comments that you would like to remain private. Since this blog is about history, topics that don’t directly relate to the history of Johnson & Johnson and its operating companies won’t be posted.. Issues not related to the history of J&J, including any product complaints, will be forwarded to the appropriate Johnson & Johnson team for follow-up as appropriate. This site will not publish any comments that have inappropriate language... so be nice! We will use the information you submit in accordance with our  Privacy Policy.

ABOUT

This blog is a way to tell some of the stories about the early days and history of Johnson & Johnson, and the people who worked here.